WORKLOADAUTOMATION.ORG | The Global Community: UC4 OM - high availability resilience - WORKLOADAUTOMATION.ORG | The Global Community

Jump to content

Welcome

This is the workload automation community forum.

Join us now and share your experiences, knowledge and request assistance. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, share code, and speak privately with members with your own private messenger.


Come and join in...

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

UC4 OM - high availability resilience How does UC4 Operations Manager (formerly UC4:Global) compare HA-wise

#1 User is offline   MrsBroflovski Icon

  • Members

Posted 08 September 2008 - 12:33 AM

Anybody have experience of running UC4 OM in high availability mode? If so, how does it compare?


Were your findings in a test or live environment?
0

#2 User is offline   Mark Mannion Icon

  • Administrators

Posted 21 September 2008 - 02:13 PM

View PostMrsBroflovski, on Sep 8 2008, 01:33 AM, said:

Anybody have experience of running UC4 OM in high availability mode? If so, how does it compare?


Were your findings in a test or live environment?


Hi Mrs Broflovski

I have experience running UC4 OM in high availability mode in a production environment (at a large investment bank). The UC4 OM architecture compares very favourably with the HA architecture of other workload automation products. The architecture also lends itself to processing high volumes of jobs with virtually no latency.

With regard to HA - The resiliency of your scheduling database is typically left in the hands of the DBAs (who will leverage the resiliency features of Oracle, DB2 or MS SQL). When it comes to the UC4 OM server processes (Communication Processes , Work Processes and the Dialog Work Processes) you run these processes on multiple servers so that scheduling and user access continues without interruption when any individual server fails.

Obviously every product has it's advantages and disadvantages, for UC4 OM its High Availability architecture is an advantage.

Cheers

Mark
0

#3 User is offline   MrsBroflovski Icon

  • Members

Posted 21 September 2008 - 10:31 PM

View PostMark Mannion, on Sep 21 2008, 03:13 PM, said:

Hi Mrs Broflovski

I have experience running UC4 OM in high availability mode in a production environment (at a large investment bank). The UC4 OM architecture compares very favourably with the HA architecture of other workload automation products. The architecture also lends itself to processing high volumes of jobs with virtually no latency.

With regard to HA - The resiliency of your scheduling database is typically left in the hands of the DBAs (who will leverage the resiliency features of Oracle, DB2 or MS SQL). When it comes to the UC4 OM server processes (Communication Processes , Work Processes and the Dialog Work Processes) you run these processes on multiple servers so that scheduling and user access continues without interruption when any individual server fails.

Obviously every product has it's advantages and disadvantages, for UC4 OM its High Availability architecture is an advantage.

Cheers

Mark


Thanks for taking the time to reply in such detail Mark, I appreciate your insight.

Mrs B
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic